But even if the court did not formally end race-based affirmative action in higher education, its analysis will make it practically impossible for colleges and universities to take race into account – as the three Democratic appointees stressed in dissent. The majority opinion claims that the court was not expressly overturning prior cases authorizing race-based affirmative action and suggested that how race has affected an applicant’s life can still be part of how their application is considered. We have never permitted admissions programs to work in that way, and we will not do so today,” Roberts wrote. Both programs lack sufficiently focused and measurable objectives warranting the use of race, unavoidably employ race in a negative manner, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful end points.
“The Harvard and UNC admissions programs cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause. Supreme Court guts affirmative action in college admissions The Supreme Court building is seen in Washington, DC, in April.
0 kommentar(er)
